United States ex rel. Ling v. City of Los Angeles, No. 25-249, ___ F.4th ___, 2026 WL 2871734 (9th Cir. Sept. 24, 2026) | United States ex rel. Novak v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., No. 18 C 5452, 2026 WL 2920869 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 29, 2026) False Claims Act · Qui Tam Settlement Approval · […]
Posted in
Posted in
FCA Case Spotlight: The Ninth Circuit Holds That a $200 Million HUD Compliance Agreement Was Not an “Alternate Remedy” and Affirms a $38.3 Million Qui Tam Settlement
By John Libby 0 on FCA Case Spotlight: The Ninth Circuit Holds That a $200 Million HUD Compliance Agreement Was Not an “Alternate Remedy” and Affirms a $38.3 Million Qui Tam Settlement